Funds of Funds: When Institutional Finance Bets on Collective Expertise

In the complex landscape of private equity, where access to the best funds is often limited to a restricted circle of informed investors, funds of funds (FoF) have emerged as an elegant solution for institutional players. These investment vehicles, which rather than placing their capital directly into companies, invest in a selection of private equity funds, offer instant diversification while benefiting from professional management. For finance students seeking to understand the sophisticated mechanisms of institutional investment, the study of funds of funds reveals advanced allocation strategies and the inherent trade-offs in managing large portfolios.

Read more: The war for talent in finance: When Wall Street and the City battle it out for their stars

The mechanism of funds of funds: An investment architecture in layers

The fundamental principle of a fund of funds rests on a multi-level investment structure. When an institutional investor such as a pension fund or an insurance company places its capital in a FoF, the latter carries out a rigorous selection of private equity funds in which it will in turn invest. These underlying private equity funds ultimately invest in private companies, generally via leveraged buyout (LBO) operations or growth capital investments. This layered architecture allows final investors to benefit from diversified exposure to the private equity market without having to select themselves the funds or target companies.

The selection of target funds by FoF teams follows a rigorous analytical process. Managers examine hundreds of private equity funds before selecting ten or twenty, evaluating criteria such as historical performance, the experience of the management team, the investment strategy, the fee structure, and the alignment of interests. Once the funds are selected, the FoF proceeds to commitments, promising to invest a certain amount in each fund. When these funds identify investment opportunities, they call upon these commitments to finance their acquisitions.

The different strategic approaches of funds of funds

Managers of funds of funds employ various strategies to optimize returns and manage risks.
The generalist approach, the most common, consists of investing in a wide range of private equity funds covering different sectors, geographies, and stages of development. This strategy offers balanced exposure to the private equity market and makes it possible to smooth performances between the different funds. Players such as Partners Group or Adams Street Partners illustrate this approach, managing diversified portfolios that mitigate risks specific to a sector or a region.

Conversely, certain funds of funds adopt a specialized approach, focusing on specific sectors or regions. This specialization allows more pointed expertise and often superior returns, but with a higher concentration risk. For example, a FoF may specialize in Asian private equity funds or in those focused on clean technologies. This targeted approach attracts investors seeking specific exposure to promising sectoral or geographical trends.

Another strategy gaining popularity is that of secondary investments. Rather than investing in new private equity funds, these FoFs buy shares in already existing funds. This approach presents several advantages: it offers faster liquidity, allows access to funds with an already established performance history, and often at a more attractive purchase price than during the initial fundraising. HarbourVest Partners is a major player in this strategy, reputed for its ability to identify value opportunities in existing private equity portfolios.

Finally, certain funds of funds combine their investments in funds with direct co-investments in companies. This hybrid approach, illustrated by players such as Pantheon, makes it possible to reduce management fees (since there are no fees on co-investments) and offers more direct control over certain investment opportunities. However, it requires more advanced expertise and the ability to directly evaluate target companies.

The advantages and limits of this investment approach

Funds of funds present several significant advantages for institutional investors. First, they offer immediate diversification in a sector where performances can vary considerably from one fund to another and from one year to another. This diversification makes it possible to reduce the specific risk linked to the performance of a single fund or a single sector. Next, they give access to otherwise inaccessible opportunities, as the best private equity funds are often reserved for a restricted circle of investors and FoFs, thanks to their size and relationships, can access them more easily. Finally, they offer professional management of allocations, as FoF teams are specialized in the analysis and selection of private equity funds, which allows investors to benefit from expertise they would not have internally.

However, funds of funds also have certain limits. The main disadvantage lies in the level of fees. Investors pay not only the fees of the FoF (generally between 0.5% and 1% of assets under management plus a share of performance), but also the fees of the underlying private equity funds (generally 2% management fees and 20% carried interest). This double layer of fees can considerably reduce net returns for final investors.

Another disadvantage is the lack of direct control, as investors in a FoF entirely delegate the selection of funds and investments, which can be problematic if they wish to have some control over their allocation. Finally, the increased complexity in tracking performances can make it difficult to precisely evaluate the added value provided by the FoF.

The main players and market trends

Several players dominate the funds of funds market. Partners Group, based in Switzerland, is one of the largest managers with more than 150 billion dollars of assets under management. Their approach combines primary, secondary, and co-investments, offering diversified exposure to the market.

Adams Street Partners, in the United States, is a pioneer in the sector with more than 50 billion dollars of assets under management, known for its disciplined approach to fund selection.
HarbourVest Partners, also American, is specialized in secondary investments with more than 90 billion dollars of assets under management, reputed for its ability to identify value opportunities in existing portfolios.

Pantheon, based in the United Kingdom, manages more than 50 billion dollars and is known for its balance between primary and secondary investments.
The FoF market is evolving rapidly with several notable trends. We observe an increase in investments in specialized funds, with FoFs increasingly seeking to invest in funds focused on specific sectors such as technology, health, or renewable energies. There is also a growing interest in secondary investments, which offer faster liquidity and an already established performance history. Co-investments are also developing, making it possible to reduce fees and have better control over certain opportunities. Finally, we note increased attention paid to sustainability, although it is not the core of their strategy.

Lessons for future finance professionals

The study of funds of funds offers several valuable lessons for finance students. It first illustrates the crucial importance of diversification in the management of investment portfolios. FoFs show how a judicious allocation between different funds and sectors can reduce risk while optimizing returns. It also highlights the crucial role of expertise in investment selection, as FoF teams spend months analyzing private equity funds before making an investment decision.

This rigor in analysis is an essential skill for any future finance professional. It also shows the importance of relationships and networks in the investment sector, as the most successful FoFs are often those with the best relationships with private equity fund managers. Finally, it illustrates the trade-offs between control, diversification, and costs, as FoFs offer valuable diversification and expertise, but at the price of a double layer of fees and a lack of direct control.

Conclusion

Funds of funds play a crucial role in the private equity ecosystem, offering institutional investors an effective way to diversify their allocations and benefit from the expertise of professionals. Their growth and increasing sophistication reflect the evolution of the private equity market and the changing needs of investors. For finance students, understanding the functioning and strategies of FoFs offers a valuable perspective on the management of large investment portfolios, illustrating the importance of diversification, expertise, and relationships in the financial sector.

As the private equity market continues to grow and become more complex, funds of funds will probably remain a key tool for institutional investors seeking to access this lucrative sector while managing risks. For students aspiring to a career in asset management or private equity, a deep understanding of FoFs will be a valuable asset in their professional toolkit, enabling them to navigate an increasingly complex and competitive investment environment.