Interviews, training, insights: everything you need to build your career path.
In the collective imagination of business school students, strategy consulting and finance often appear as two distinct, or even opposing, career paths. One is seen as being oriented toward reflection, macroeconomic analysis, and long-term vision, while the other is perceived as more focused on execution, numbers, and transactions.
For several years, the mergers and acquisitions advisory landscape has been undergoing a profound transformation. Alongside large international investment banks and traditional boutiques, a more discreet yet increasingly influential category has emerged: so-called “partner-led” investment banks.
In the universe of private equity, asset management, or infrastructure funds, the choice between an international fund and a domestic fund is a structuring decision for a career in finance. Beyond the size of assets under management or the reputation of the platforms, these two environments offer different professional experiences
Periods of financial crisis have always acted as a revealer. While some investors suffer heavy losses, others manage not only to preserve their capital, but sometimes to achieve their best performances. Conversely, these same investors may appear more restrained during prolonged bull markets.
For many finance students, one of the first structuring decisions concerns career positioning: should one specialise very early in a specific role, or instead build a more generalist path before refining one’s orientation?
A singular figure in European capitalism, Daniel Křetínský has established himself in less than twenty years as one of the most influential and discreet investors on the continent. At the head of an empire built around energy, infrastructure, retail and media, he embodies an approach to private investment based on the long term.
Long perceived as peripheral functions, Investor Relations (IR) teams now occupy a central position within private equity funds. As the industry becomes more structured, regulated, and professionalized, investor relations are becoming a major strategic issue. IR teams are now at the heart of the credibility, growth, and sustainability of management companies.
Private equity is often viewed through the lens of investment teams. Analysts, associates, and partners command attention, embodying the most visible image of the sector: deal selection, financial modeling, negotiation, and value creation. Yet, this view remains incomplete. Behind every successful fund lies a structured organization, supported by essential functions that ensure the smooth operation of the platform.
The M&A profession is often associated with demanding hours, constant pressure and near-constant availability. For many students and young analysts, joining an M&A team means accepting a lasting imbalance between their professional and personal lives.
For a long time, private equity was perceived as a world dominated by pure finance. Funds almost exclusively favoured candidates with backgrounds in investment banking, strategy consulting or transactional auditing, who were capable of structuring complex transactions and modelling sophisticated financial scenarios.